In the late 1970s I proposed to the Board of Commissioners that a State Program for Historic Districts - HARB - be adopted for Lower Merion. Because of the large number of Historic Buildings in the Township they agreed and HARB (Historic Architectural Review Board) was enacted. We initially started with 25 buildings; now over 500 are on the list including Central Ardmore. For that reason the former Ardmore Theater marquee cannot be removed although the theatre is no longer there.


Ardmore’s history is rich, originally settled the late 19th Century as Athensville, a stop on the “early Pennsylvania Railroad”. It has grown and prospered as a town center, the seat of local government and a center people could migrate around. This Ardmore Towne center is occupied a shopping district of unique stores covering an extreme range of good services, not the least of which includes the former Admore Theater, the Artdmore Fire Department, Township Offices, Unique Stores and Restaurants. The area proposed for demolition is part of an “improvement in the railroad access” to that area which really already occucers by several alleys between building strips.


Demolition of that unique area for “greater” railroad accress violates HARB, the character of the district and theatens the Unique Character of the Towne. The access already exists though can be inhanced by unique planting, store access and services. It seems that access could be enhanced by making the “alleys” more “habitable” and inviting, even enhancing some rear areas.


As former Advocate for the Historic Preservation of Ardmore’s Central Area I ask that the Township reconsider changing their decision to destroy the “Historic” Character of Ardmore’s shopping Distrist and think about enhancing the avenues that already exist. With the wealth of History that is symbolized by these buildings, Ardmore cannot afford to lose it’s connection to it’s roots - HARB works so hard to promote maintaining that history. Please do not ignore the Historic Character of the Village for want of enhancing the Railway passangers convenience.

 

July/August, 2004

 

Back to editorials

Back to home